NFEDZ.ORG

Archive for June, 2010

When you start off on your tour of the internet, one thing becomes clear almost immediately. If you use the free online search engines, you can get a flood of quotes into your inbox. All the major auto insurers are tied into one or more of the search engines and they all respond to searches with their quotes. This buries you under a mountain of information. There just is not enough time to follow up every quote on every changed variable. Assuming, of course, that you got quotes using different factors, e.g. changing the amount of the deductible, how many miles a year you drive, and so on. The only way you can work out how to get the maximum discounts is to play with the system. So, if you are starting the process of finding a new vehicle to drive, first check out the premium rates on all the makes and models you are thinking about buying. You will be surprised by big the differences are. Then look at payment methods for the insurance. There are discounts available if you pay the premium as an annual lump sum. Should you bundle the home with the auto insurance? This can save at least 10%. Insure more than one vehicle? There are so many options giving you a discount, you need to work your way through multiple searches to understand how much money can be saved.

Talk to your friends and there is likely to be one suggestion they all make. Go for the maximum deductible. This gives you the biggest single discount. OK. So they are advising you to self-insure. Instead of looking to the insurance company to pay all your claims, big or small, you are signing up to a deal where the insurer only pays the big claims and you pay all the small claims. Look back over your driving career and talk to your family and trusted friends. Find out how many accidents they have had and roughly how much damage was caused. Read the rest of this entry »

There are times when you get an overview and then it hits you, “Somethings just don’t add up.” Well, you remember Wellpoint, don’t you? This is the friendly company that, around January or February, announced it was going to increase premium rates by up to 39% in a number of states around the Union. President Obama got himself all worked up, citing them as the real reason why all the Democrats in Washington should band together and take a stand against the insurance industry. Then, sure as eggs is eggs, there was a stampede to get the healthcare reform bill to the President for him to sign it into law. Those Democrats sure did have fun beating on Wellpoint. So the big question is what happened next? Here’s one of the largest corporations in the insurance market demanding premium increases. Did it get its way?

The answer starts off in California where the maximum rate of 39% was due to take effect. The state referred the proposed increase to independent auditors for an opinion. The answer came back negative. It seemed Wellpoint couldn’t add up. Well, that’s oversimplifying things a little. But the reality is that the numbers Wellpoint offered to support their premium increases were based on some very shaky mathematical assumptions. When news of the report became public, Wellpoint withdrew the proposed increase. Acting on this, Kathleen Sebelius who is Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services sent out a letter to all state insurance commissioners encouraging them to review every proposed premium increase. This is the first sign that the balance of power is shifting against the insurance industry and in favor of the consumer. For too long, insurance companies have hidden behind complicated mathematical explanations and gamed the system. With the Affordable Care Act now law, Sebelius is encouraging every state to give itself the power to approve rate increases. The first sign of continuing good news for consumers comes out of Connecticut where Attorney General Blumental forced an audit of Blue Shield and Anthem Blue Cross, both Wellpoint subsidiaries. Connecticut’s Insurance Commissioner Sullivan rejected these companies requests for increases last year. It seems likely the same thing will happen this year. Read the rest of this entry »

Somewhere in the dim and distant past of learning English, an idiom surfaced referring to gift horses and their mouths. The translation is that, when someone gives you a gift, it’s ungracious of you to publicly examine it too carefully. Yet, in the case of Prop. 17 which appears on the ballot in California, we should perhaps open the horse’s mouth and examine it’s teeth. It may prove to be an old Trojan horse and a gift we should reject.

Why be suspicious? Because the force behind Prop. 17 is not a consumer advocate, it’s the Mercury General Corp. Yes, friends, we’re supposed to believe that an insurance company wants voters in California to pressure lawmakers so that the insurance industry can give millions of dollars in discounts to policyholders. There’s another of those idioms that comes to mind at this point. It’s something about pigs suddenly sprouting wings and taking to the air in the joy of flight. Indeed, so committed is Mercury to Pro. 17 that it’s paying millions of dollars in TV ads to persuade everyone to vote for it. Bless its little cotton socks. It’s trying so hard to do right by Californians. Read the rest of this entry »

The world of insurance is ruled by statistics. Actuaries collect all the information they can about every traffic accident in the US. Then, because everyone wants the most complete information possible, the insurers share the information about their own claims and the accidents they have found where no claim was made. It makes for an impressive amount of data. The majority of the information about claims is routed through the Comprehensive Loss Underwriting Exchange (CLUE). Because this is a national resource, all the major insurers from around the country search it before making quotes for new business. If there are no claims registered against your name, the premium will be the standard rates for someone of your gender, age and driving experience with local variations based on where you live. But if one or more claims are registered, the new insurers may decide you are a high-risk driver and try to deter you with a high premium. There’s nothing illegal or unethical about this. It’s just the way the business works.

Because it’s a national resource, the quality of the information is usually quite reliable. When a search is made, your history over the last seven years is supplied. If you are worried about what data is stored about you, the Fair Credit Reporting Act gives you the right to a copy. Write to Consumer Disclosure, PO Box 105108, Atlanta, Georgia 30348-5108, or you can call (866) 527-2600 toll free. If you find any of the information is wrong, you are either allowed to have it put right or to have an explanatory note attached to the information explaining how the loss came to be made. Unfortunately, some of the insurers run private exchanges in individual states. It can be more difficult to police the accuracy of this information. That’s why it’s good news to see Attorneys General policing the system. In Massachusetts, for example, ten insurance companies have agreed to pay penalties for failing to correct records in their private exchange. The initial findings of at-fault were accurate, but the companies then failed to record when appeals reversed the findings. This left thousands of motorists wrongly recorded as at fault. So, if you have any reason to suspect your local insurance industry is relying on inaccurate information about your claims history, it’s vital you take action. Failure to have the record set straight can cost you thousands of dollars over the years. If the information in CLUE is correct, get your local state’s Department of Insurance to check into any local databases. Read the rest of this entry »