NFEDZ.ORG

Archive for January 20th, 2010

The one thing most likely to impress your insurance company is that you have taken a number of simple steps to reduce the risk of a burglar entering your home. The result? A reduction in the premium is guaranteed. This can be relatively minor things like deadlocks on the doors or, if there are real risks of robbery or kidnapping, the more expensive installation of a panic room. As with all decisions, it’s a balance between the costs of the work and the benefits in the reduction of premiums. Finally, even if you cannot afford a full alarm system, there are cheap ways of protecting your property. Read the rest of this entry »

Occupation plays a very important role in a person’s life. What we do for living pretty much determines our entire lifestyle and delivers certain risks to deal with everyday. If you’re working with toxic substances on a daily basis, you have a type of risk that haul drivers for example are very uncommon with. The same goes for any other high-risk job that has special circumstances posing danger to your health and life. And of course, if your occupation has a higher degree of risk in average, you are likely to pay more for insuring your life. Risk and insurance rates are connected directly, which means the safer your job the lower premiums you’ll have to pay. Read the rest of this entry »

Politics is endlessly surprising. The theory of democracy states the people have the power through the ballot box. The reality is slightly different with representative government. At preset intervals, the people have a say in who should represent their interests, and may vote on proposals and policy initiatives. This actually leaves them rather powerless. It’s the elected representatives who have a better control over events, in consultation with all the vested interests and power brokers who have influence behind the scenes. This is not to condemn the current system as broken or corrupt. As it stands, it does have the benefit of being very slow-moving. There is always passionate debate when big changes are proposed. This means changes are more likely to be made for the right reasons. Read the rest of this entry »

Once, the world was simple. If there were two opposites like either/or and day/night, it was easy to treat them as different and act accordingly. Then along came the idea of equality and some opposites were judged the same when it came to the treatment they deserved. At least, it’s now politically incorrect to suggest men and women should be treated differently. So the law imposes rules to prevent discrimination on the ground of sex (or gender if that is also different). Except that, when it comes to insurance, there are some very good reasons for treating men and women differently. Although the law may have changed, there are some fixed biological and cultural roles that seem permanently attached to women. We may now vote, own property and pursue our own careers, but we give birth and are expected to raise a family with the possibility of becoming a carer for elderly parents. In juggling between all these conflicting demands on our time, it’s easy to drop the ball of financial planning. Read the rest of this entry »